Peer Review Policy

Journal of Social Informatics and Global Health follows a double-blind peer-review process after an editorial review. Where the reviewers have not shared any details of the authors such as their names or affiliations and review reports are also shared anonymously with the authors.

The virtue of a double-blind peer-review system is that it ensures the evaluation of the manuscript is purely based on the quality of the content. It enables reviewers to assess the manuscripts in an unbiased manner and let them look if the content is original, valid, and has some significance.

Generally, the manuscripts are scientifically reviewed by at least two experts of international repute. They assess if the submitted article is sound, comprehensive, and has no replication of other published works. If reviewers recommend the manuscript as suitable for publication in review reports editorial team reaches a final decision.